Data Tiles
Market Signals

Decision-Driven Business

Responding to · Forrester

AI Spending Is Accelerating. Why Is ROI Still So Difficult To Find?

As AI investment accelerates, boards and executive teams are asking where the return is. Data Tiles responds to Forrester's AI readiness perspective and explores why AI ROI depends on trusted information, clear ownership, governance and better decisions.

Responding to · ForresterTheme · ValueAuthor · Cameron Price
ContributorWith a perspective from Lili Marsh, Head of Partner & Customer Success.
Referenced Forrester Research

The CIO's Guide to AI Readiness

AuthorFrederic Giron, Vice President & Principal Analyst, Forrester

View Forrester reportforrester.com/report/the-cios-guide-to-ai-readiness/RES190986

Source note: This Market Signals article is a Data Tiles interpretation of Forrester's publicly available research perspectives on AI readiness. It is intended as an executive response and industry perspective rather than a reproduction of Forrester research.

By Cameron Price

Founder & CEO, Data Tiles

Contributor: Lili Marsh, Head of Partner & Customer Success

For the past two years, organizations have been encouraged to think of AI as the next great business transformation opportunity. Vendors have promised productivity gains, operational efficiencies and entirely new ways of working. Boards have approved new budgets. Executive teams have launched pilots. Technology leaders have raced to evaluate platforms, copilots and increasingly sophisticated AI agents. Yet despite the extraordinary momentum behind AI, a question is beginning to emerge in boardrooms around the world. After all the investment, where is the return?

This question sits at the heart of Forrester's The CIO's Guide to AI Readiness, authored by Vice President and Principal Analyst Frederic Giron. The report arrives at a particularly important moment because the conversation around AI is changing. Two years ago, organizations were focused on understanding what AI might be capable of. Today, they are being asked to demonstrate what it is actually delivering. AI spending continues to rise across infrastructure, platforms, models and talent, yet many leadership teams still struggle to articulate how those investments are translating into measurable business outcomes. The pressure to invest has not diminished, but the pressure to prove value has increased significantly.

What makes Forrester's research particularly useful is that it challenges one of the most common assumptions in the market: that AI readiness is primarily a technology challenge. Most organizations instinctively evaluate readiness through a technical lens. Do we have the right infrastructure? Do we have access to the right models? Have we hired the right skills? While these questions remain important, Forrester argues they represent only part of the equation. Organizations that successfully operationalize AI tend to demonstrate maturity across leadership, governance, operating models, business ownership and trust. In other words, readiness is not simply about whether an organization can deploy AI. It is about whether it can absorb AI, govern AI and translate AI into measurable business outcomes.

This distinction helps explain why so many organizations remain trapped between experimentation and transformation. Many already possess modern cloud environments, capable analytics teams, sophisticated data platforms and access to leading AI technologies. Yet despite these investments, they struggle to move beyond isolated pilots and demonstrations. According to Forrester, the issue is often not technical capability but organizational capability. Executive sponsorship may be inconsistent. Ownership may be unclear. Governance may be disconnected from operational processes. Business teams may not trust the information supporting AI-driven decisions. Success may be measured through activity rather than outcomes.

The report highlights a number of characteristics commonly found in organizations that are successfully operationalizing AI. Executive sponsorship is visible and sustained. Accountability for outcomes is clearly established. Governance is embedded into business processes rather than added after deployment. Collaboration exists between business and technology teams. Most importantly, AI initiatives are directly connected to business objectives and measurable value. These observations may appear straightforward, yet they represent some of the most significant barriers organizations face today.

Forrester also highlights the importance of organizational adaptability. As AI becomes increasingly embedded into workflows, decision-making and customer engagement, organizations must be capable of continuously evolving the way they operate. Governance models must mature. Ownership structures must adapt. Decision-making frameworks must change. The challenge is no longer introducing AI into the business. The challenge is ensuring the business can evolve alongside AI. At Data Tiles we call this “AI as an experience”, where AI is invisible to the organization. It is the enablement that is experienced.

This is why the report feels particularly relevant in 2026. Executive expectations are changing rapidly. Boards are demanding evidence that AI investments are translating into competitive advantage. CFOs are increasingly focused on measurable outcomes and sustainable returns. Investors want confidence that AI initiatives are improving productivity, profitability and growth rather than simply increasing technology expenditure. The market is moving from experimentation to accountability.

And this is where I believe the conversation becomes particularly interesting.

Forrester correctly identifies readiness as one of the defining challenges facing organizations today. However, I would argue that the opportunity is even larger than the report suggests. Much of the market still approaches AI as a way to improve existing processes. The underlying assumption is that AI should help organizations perform the same work faster, cheaper or more efficiently than before.

That view is understandable.

It is also limiting.

One of the greatest mistakes organizations can make is treating AI primarily as a replacement strategy. Human-led projects have often struggled with delays, complexity, competing priorities, inconsistent outcomes and escalating costs. The temptation is to assume AI can simply replace those activities and produce better results. Yet if a process is fundamentally flawed, replacing people with AI does not create transformation. It simply automates the failure.

The greatest opportunity presented by AI is not the replacement of human effort. It is the opportunity to rethink how work happens altogether.

Too many organizations begin their AI journey by asking where people can be removed from a process. The more valuable question is how that process would be designed if trusted information, business context and intelligent automation were available from the outset. That shift in thinking changes everything. It moves the conversation away from cost reduction and toward reinvention. It encourages organizations to stop replicating yesterday's operating model and start designing tomorrow's.

This is where the conversation around ROI often becomes confused.

Organizations do not invest in AI because they want AI. They invest because they want better outcomes. They want cost out or revenue up. They want stronger growth, improved customer experiences, greater operational efficiency, faster decision-making, reduced risk and more effective use of resources. AI is simply the mechanism through which those outcomes are expected to be achieved.

The problem is that organizations struggle to connect AI activity to business outcomes. A pilot may be successful. A model may achieve impressive levels of accuracy. An agent may perform exactly as designed. Yet leadership teams are often left asking the same question: what changed? Did revenue increase? Did costs decrease? Did productivity improve? Did customer retention improve? Did decision quality improve?

Without clear answers, AI risks becoming another technology investment that generates activity rather than transformation.

This is why I often describe AI readiness as decision readiness. The organizations creating the strongest returns from AI are rarely those deploying the most technology. They are the organizations creating the shortest path between trusted information and business action. They establish clear ownership. They align business definitions. They embed governance into the point of decision-making. They create trusted information assets that both humans and AI can rely upon with confidence.

At Data Tiles, we increasingly see organizations moving beyond the idea of becoming data-driven and toward becoming decision-driven. The distinction is important. Data-driven organizations focus on access to information. Decision-driven organizations focus on confidence in action. They recognize that data alone does not create value. Value is created when trusted information is connected to business outcomes and can be acted upon with confidence.

This is where trusted data products become particularly powerful. A trusted data product is not simply a dataset. It combines information, business context, ownership, governance, lineage and accountability into a reusable business asset. It provides both people and AI with confidence that the information supporting a decision is trusted, explainable and relevant. When these foundations exist, AI stops being an experiment. It becomes operational. More importantly, it becomes measurable.

The organizations that will generate the greatest value from AI over the next decade are unlikely to be those deploying the largest number of agents or investing in the largest number of platforms. They will be those that create entirely new ways of operating around trusted information, intelligent automation and decision velocity. They will use AI not to replicate human-led inefficiencies, but to design better systems from the beginning.

That is where transformation occurs.

And ultimately, that is where ROI is found.

What We Are Seeing In North America

Across North America, the conversation has become increasingly commercial. Executive teams are applying the same level of scrutiny to AI investments that they would apply to any major strategic initiative. The expectation is no longer innovation for innovation's sake. The expectation is measurable impact. Leaders want to understand the economic outcomes, expected payback periods and long-term value creation associated with AI investments. What is particularly interesting is that the strongest returns are often coming from relatively focused initiatives rather than the most technically ambitious projects. Organizations are finding value where AI removes operational friction, improves customer engagement, accelerates decision-making or helps teams execute more effectively. The common theme is not technology sophistication. It is a clear connection between AI and business performance.

What We Are Seeing In the UK & EU

Across the UK and Europe, the ROI conversation has a sharper edge than it did twelve months ago. Budgets that were approved on the promise of transformation are now being asked to justify themselves against quite specific operational and financial outcomes. Finance leaders, audit committees and regulators are aligned in pushing the same question — what changed in the business because of this investment? What we are seeing is a quiet but important shift away from large, horizontal AI programs and toward smaller, accountable initiatives anchored in a single decision, a single process or a single customer journey. UK and EU executives are also factoring compliance cost into the ROI equation in a way that is less prominent elsewhere; an AI use case that cannot be explained, governed or audited is increasingly being treated as a negative return, not a neutral one. The organizations getting credible payback are the ones treating trusted data products as the unit of value — reusable assets that compound returns across multiple decisions rather than being rebuilt for every new project.

What We Are Seeing In APJ

Across APJ, the challenge is often one of prioritization and scale. Most organizations can identify dozens of potential AI opportunities, but few have the resources, governance structures or operational maturity to pursue all of them simultaneously. Leaders are increasingly focused on identifying where value can be demonstrated first, how trust can be established quickly and how successful initiatives can be scaled across multiple markets and regulatory environments. The organizations making the greatest progress are showing discipline. Rather than chasing every opportunity, they are concentrating on high-value use cases where business ownership is clear, trusted information already exists and outcomes can be measured. In a region as diverse as APJ, that ability to prioritize effectively is becoming a significant competitive advantage.

Partner & Customer Perspective

One of the strongest themes emerging from customer and partner conversations is not uncertainty about AI itself, but uncertainty about where to begin. Most organizations have no shortage of ideas. What they often lack is confidence about which initiatives are most likely to create measurable outcomes. The challenge is rarely technology. It is identifying where trusted information, clear ownership and business value intersect. The customers achieving the strongest results tend to focus on a specific business challenge first. They establish trust in the information supporting the decision, align stakeholders around success criteria and then apply AI in a targeted way. The organizations creating momentum are not necessarily moving fastest. They are moving with clarity.

Lili Marsh

Head of Partner & Customer Success

Questions for Leaders

As AI investment continues to accelerate, leaders should ask themselves:

  • Can we clearly explain how AI is creating business value?
  • Are our AI initiatives linked to measurable business outcomes?
  • Are we redesigning processes or simply automating existing inefficiencies?
  • Do we know who owns the information driving AI-powered decisions?
  • Can we trust and explain the outputs generated by AI?
  • Are we investing in technology, or are we investing in better decisions?

Because the next phase of AI adoption will not be defined by who deploys the most technology.

It will be defined by who creates the most value.

And that value will come from trusted information, clear business context, intelligent automation and the courage to rethink how work gets done.

Part of the AI Readiness Market Signals Trilogy

Three signals. One readiness story.

Theme · Readiness

The Readiness Gap

Gartner's 2026 Data & Analytics Trends

Read the Signal

Theme · Context

The Meaning Gap

Gartner's Warning on AI Agents and Semantics

Current Article

Theme · Value

The ROI Gap

Forrester's CIO Guide to AI Readiness

Ready to move from AI activity to AI outcomes?

AI ROI does not come from deploying more technology. It comes from trusted information, clear ownership, active governance and better decisions. Data Tiles helps organizations create the trusted data products and decision foundations needed to make AI measurable.

Continue the Conversation

Take this signal further.

Connect with Cameron

CEO & Founder

Speak with Cameron Price about decision-driven data strategy, data products, AI readiness, and how organizations can bring trusted data to the point of decision.

Connect on LinkedIn

DM Lili on LinkedIn

Head of Partner & Customer Success

Message Lili Marsh to compare notes on what partners and customers are seeing in market — from governance activation to standing up trusted data products that AI can safely use.

Connect on LinkedIn

Email John Goode

Global Chief Revenue Officer

Reach out to John Goode to discuss how your organization can become more decision-driven for business outcomes and AI adoption.

Email John@data-tiles.io